) iambinarymind (

RSS

Posts tagged with "property rights"

georgeoughttohelp:

Does taxation really depend on threats of violence? Isn’t taxation part of the social contract?

You Can Always Leave is the third film in the George Ought to Help series. I hope you enjoy it!

If you’d like to follow the progress of future videos you can ‘like’ https://www.facebook.com/georgeoughttohelp

[U]nless you are pro-market, pro-private property, you have no basis to oppose the state, for the state is simply the agency of institutionalized aggression against private property rights. To oppose the state is to support property rights, since opposing aggression means opposing the invasion of property. Conversely, those who oppose property rights inevitably support the state or other forms of aggression.

- Stephan Kinsella - Down with anti-market “anarchists” (via laliberty)

Mar 4

[I]f you want people to accept your right to possess private property, guns, you had better consider accepting the right of other people to possess private property, drugs, if they so choose. Liberty is seamless and does not allow for exceptions. Liberty is doing what you wish with what you own. Doing what you wish with what you own. In fact, the war on drugs has proved to be the major driving force behind the war on guns. Same war, different name. …

Progressives don’t hate guns; they love guns. They love them so much they want to be the only ones who have any. They want a gun monopoly. Again, a progressive is a person who has this fantastic dream of creating a utopia on earth by threatening people with government guns if they don’t comply with their utopian schemes. The difference between progressives and us is this: [t]hey want to use guns aggressively, to make peaceful people do things they don’t want to do; [w]e wish to use them only defensively, to stop a government that gets out of control and engages in mass murder, or systemically tramples [our rights]. …

The Second Amendment has nothing to do with hunting, sport or target shooting, or collecting antiques, and its main purpose is not to allow you to protect yourself from criminals although that is a secondary and important purpose. It is an undeniable historical fact that the central purpose of the right to bear arms is to allow the people to protect themselves against the government.

- James Ostrowski (via laliberty)

Mar 4

Contre la propriété intellectuelle - Jeffrey Tucker

Jeff Tucker gives a concise explanation of why IP is a bad idea to two French gentlemen from ContrepointsOrg, including a discussion of how Ayn Rand went astray on this issue (see also De la propriété intellectuelle (1)).

(Source: youtube.com)

Mar 3

Does Spanking Violate The Non-Aggression Principle?

anarchei:

image

Image: HA! Designs

Stefan Molyneux:

Libertarianism centres around the nonaggression principle and a respect for property rights, which are derived from the axiom of self-ownership.

Libertarians condemn social institutions which violate the nonaggression principle and property rights. Taxation, national debts, fiat currency, unjust invasions, and the persecution and incarceration of nonviolent citizens through drug laws — all these have been roundly and soundly criticised by libertarians through the decades.

The one thing that all these institutions have in common is that we, as individuals, can do next to nothing to oppose them. Even as a collective movement, not only has libertarianism been unable to shrink the unjust power of the State, but it’s hard to see how the movement has even slowed the rate of its growth.

Libertarianism is fundamentally a moral philosophy with political implications — however, some libertarians have a habit of focusing on the political implications, which cannot be changed by any individual, and avoiding the personal implications of the moral philosophy, which can be put into practice by everyone.

For instance, while countless books have been written analysing economics from a libertarian or Austrian perspective, very few have been written about how to apply Libertarian morality to parenting. Ayn Rand touched on parenting in a throwaway scene at Galt’s Gulch in ‘Atlas Shrugged,’ and Murray Rothbard reaffirmed the right of adult children to leave abusive parents in ‘Kids Lib,’ but I do not know of any major work by a Libertarian or Objectivist focusing on parenting. Nathaniel Branden has touched on the subject in a few articles, but does not mention any particular discipline techniques.

Very few libertarians become bank robbers or Federal Reserve Chairmen (but I repeat myself). By far the most common aggression Libertarians will ever personally use or experience is the disciplining of children. This is a moral question central to our lives as parents, yet it has to my knowledge never been addressed in Libertarian literature.

So — in terms of practical morality, the most essential question for libertarians to discuss is: Does spanking violate the nonaggression principle?

Read More

Jan 1

thinksquad:

Law without Government: Principles

Self-defence is a human right

the-altar:

And guns are the great equalising implements of that human right. Arguments to the contrary are the arguments of every single tyrant of the last century. This human right should also include access to automatic and semi-automatic weapons, not to be confused with “assault weapons”, which is a purposely open ended term conjured by opportunistic politicians in order to evoke an emotional reaction in their more submissive and uniformed constituents. Criminals will have theirs, so the choice to have ours should not be hindered. Never forget the fact that the mind is the original “assault weapon”. The mind has been used to turn fertiliser into a massive bomb. The mind has been used to employ humble box cutters in order to bring about a horrific terrorist attack. The mind of a motivated criminal can see around obstacles, including the law. There are no guarantees, there are only chances, and we deserve every chance we can get. Arguments for gun control have everything to do with control and nothing to do with curbing violence. So pardon me if I don’t share your enthusiasm for deifying and empowering those who legally murder innocent people on a daily basis with the flick of a pen at the expense of our right to defend ourselves from all criminals who may threaten our well being. 

After all, a property right is simply the exclusive right to control a scarce resource. Property rights specify which persons own - that is, have the right to control - various scarce resources in a given region or jurisdiction. Yet everyone and every political theory advance some theory of property. None of the various forms of socialism deny property rights; each version will specify an owner for every scarce resource. If the state nationalizes an industry, it is asserting ownership of these means of production. If the state taxes you, it is implicitly asserting ownership of the funds taken. If my land is transferred to a private developer by eminent domain statutes, the developer is now the owner. If the law allows a recipient of racial discrimination to sue his employer for a sum of money, he is the owner of the money.

Protection of and respect for property rights is thus not unique to libertarianism. What is distinctive about libertarianism is its particular property assignment rules: its view concerning who is the owner of each contestable resource, and how to determine this.[…]

The libertarian seeks property assignment rules because he values or accepts various grundnorms such as justice, peace, prosperity, cooperation, conflict-avoidance, and civilization. The libertarian view is that self-ownership is the only property assignment rule compatible with these grundorms; it is implied by them.

- Stephan Kinsella, What Libertarianism Is (via conza)

Reality Check: Is SCOTUS Putting An End To “Personal” Property?

Ben Swann Reality Check takes a look at a case before the Supreme Court that would mean the end “first rule principle” for selling personal property that origniates overseas